1/13/2024 0 Comments Christopher steele orbisAt this point, Danchenko allowed the New York Times to name him. Within days his name had been disclosed by the Russian television station, RT, which is ever alert to opportunities to discredit ‘Russiagate’. Unusually, this was granted, and although the name of the witness was redacted – anonymity being the price of his cooperation – he was quickly identified. The way this emerged was that Lindsey Graham, a Republican Senator and supporter of Donald Trump, had used his position as Senate Judiciary Committee chair to ask for the release of hitherto classified information about the FBI investigation into the dossier. He was interviewed by the FBI, and his testimony appears to contradict key parts of the dossier, suggesting that Steele may have exaggerated the soundness of some allegations. A Russian-trained lawyer with US degrees, he was named as Igor Danchenko, who supplemented his pay by taking commissions for information on his erstwhile homeland from companies such as Christopher Steele’s. According to the report, the prime source for the Steele dossier was no intelligence ‘deep throat’ based in Moscow, but a 42-year old researcher based in Washington. The doubts are sown by a revelation reported at length in the New York Times on 25 July and circulated widely via the Twittersphere. ![]() ![]() ![]() Many months after he gave his evidence, there are reasons to cast fresh doubt on the veracity of his dossier – and by extension on the reliability of what he may have said to the inquiry. The inclusion of Christopher Steele, on the other hand, raised questions about why he was there. If the views of these witnesses are well-known, however, they are sound and sincerely held – even if some of us do not share their perspective.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |